Why do people loathe the way writers whinge?

You’re let’s say, a shop assistant, or a taxi driver, or a farmer, or a bank teller, or a brain surgeon. You whinge about the poor pay, or the rude customers, or the long working day, or the dullness, or the stress – or all of the above.

Do those who hear/read what you have to say then berate you strongly for daring to whinge? You have no right to whinge! You are lucky! If you don’t like it, don’t do it!

Ok, so maybe nowadays with this economic climate, anyone who has a job is both privileged and lucky – but I don’t want to go there. Let’s stick to my point, which is:
Why is it considered a privilege to be a writer – and therefore not something you have a right to complain about? (Conversely, why is it not a privilege to be a farmer or a pharmacist?)

About writers one hears things like: You have been given a gift, how dare you then complain! You have no nagging boss, no set working hours, no travel time, you can dress how you please – and you dare to complain? You are paid for a talent other people would die to have! (Why is it assumed that if you write you were given that talent rather than had to learn and work at it for years until finally, finally, you produced something of value?)

Why am I ranting?

Because I read the comments section here, after a Guardian article where a number of writers talked about writing. (Thanks to Bibliobibuli for the heads up; she is a wonderful fund of info about things writerly.) What the writers have to say is interesting. Most of the comments are intelligent and interesting too.

And here are some of the others:

“If you don’t enjoy writing, spare the rest of us, and don’t bloody do it.”

“It amazes me how ungrateful these g*ts are for their incredible good fortune – makes me want to smack most of them! I work a 50 hour week in a demanding job, am raising kids and trying to keep up with all the other bits and pieces of my life, and I still make time to write because it’s such a joy. I should be so lucky to get paid for it too.”

“Thousands losing their jobs each week, countless more loathing whatever job they’re clinging on to, bosses breathing down their neck, sales targets to hit, pitiful commissions to earn….This piece is a wind-up, right ? Not very funny, guys. Get yerselves a proper job.”

“You’re a writer who doesn’t like writing? Go and work in a petrol station then. Twits.”

“…come across as terrible whingers considering they’ve been given this great gift.”

“…all you writers having to slave over your novels, if you’re not enjoying it, really, don’t do it.
I don’t think any decent books have come out of any of these whiners so there really is no need.”

Writers have just as much right to whinge as anybody else. Despise whingeing, per se, if you must, but don’t single out writers for doing it and imply they shouldn’t because they are writers.

Believe me, writing fulltime and professionally is just like any other job in many ways – you have to do it whether you feel like it or not, and it has the added difficulty that you only find in jobs that emphasize creativity: you have to produce certain emotions in others even when you are not feeling like that at all. Your beloved dog just died, your older kids have the flu, the baby has colic, your mortgage payment is behind, your partner is talking divorce and you just crashed the car and broke a finger – too bad. You still have to write that comedy love scene anyway.

Love it, hate it, sure I can’t do it, yeah all of those. Would I do anything else? Nope.

Fun with a book cover

One of the nice things about being published by Orbit UK is that they have such great covers. Now obviously the book below is not mine, but I adore the cover. I believe it is the tale of pious twin brothers who earn a living as grave robbers – and dig up more than they expected, which sounds intriguing. More here. about the book.

Look carefully at the illustration.
As for me – yesterday was a double whammy: due date for Book 2 – and copy edit for Book 1 landed in my email box. I shall be working on the copy edit mostly for the next week or two and I have an extension for the delivery of Book 1.

Untitled Post

Some pix from the (supposedly daily) walks my husband and I take. Above: morning mist.
Below: in the seriously degraded forest.


I look down and see petals beneath my feet – thousands of them, everywhere. When I look up. I see the tree covered in flowers. A closer look – and the flowers are exquisite.

And sometimes perfection is more lively. We saw this little fellow – as big as a thumbnail – crossing the road.
I think it is probably a Puddle Frog (Occidozyga laevis) – and it never grows much bigger than 3 or 4 cm.

More burglaries

Just heard that the house directly across the road was broken into, the people threatened with a parang (machete), tied up etc etc. The house was then ransacked by Indonesians burglars at 5 a.m. (I think I read somewhere that 20% of the Malaysian prison population is Indonesian but I can’t verify that and my memory for figures is a bit suss.)

An attempt was also made on our next door neighbour’s house, but they woke up and the attempt was foiled.

Things are bad here. It seems to be not a matter of “if” but “when” one is burgled. Sooner or later someone is going to die.

It is not a particularly rich neighbourhood, although there are a few wealthy people in it. Mostly it’s just teachers and uni lecturers and pensioners like us.

We have an alarm, grilles on all windows and doors, at night we lock all room doors and the doors themselves are solid wood (they smash down other kinds of doors to get to sleeping occupants). Now the neighbourhood is talking of paying a ghurka guard. I dunno what else we can do. Invest in some very nasty pit bulls? As this is basically a Muslim area, there are no dogs, which is probably one reason it is targetted.

What really worries me is that we have very little of interest to burglars. Much of my valuable jewellery has long since been stolen; what was left I gave to my children rather than see it go the same way. We don’t wear rolexes, or keep money in the house. My laptop is years old and my husband’s is so old it doesn’t even have wifi. We don’t have a TV or a stereo set or a hand phone that’s not four years old, or an MP3 player or an Ipod or any of these other gadgets of interest to a thief. And they are known to get very angry indeed when they don’t find valuables.

There are times when I want to leave this country.

What’s up for March

Well, Book 2 of the trilogy is due, for a start. But there are a number of other exciting, interesting and unsettling things going on at the moment and for the whole of March. Quite a lot of stresses, some of them good ones.
The result may be that my blogging will be a tad sporadic at times. I may not even be within internet range sometimes too. So be prepared not to see too much up here at times.

Never fear, I shall return…

The pix are just leaves taken on our morning walk. I love the patterns of the forest floor…

More from the palace in Yogyakarta

Here are some more photos from the Sultan’s palace in Yogya. In the second pix, the yellow cloth signifies that the Sultan is in residence. He is the sole Sultan remaining in Indonesia who has both clout and respect (he is the elected Governor of the province), perhaps partly because his family risked much to oppose Dutch colonialism after the war – and that was a risky business, believe me…
I remember reading a book in my much younger days called “Revolt in Paradise” about this period and this area – written by the woman known as Surabaya Sue. A fascinating woman. She called herself by her Indonesian name, K’tut Tantri, but was born with the much more prosaic name of Muriel Pearson. She had Scottish-American-Australian connections. My mother bought the book because she remembered hearing her on the radio while she was in Australia in the 1940s drumming up support for Indonesian independence. You can read a little about her here. (Surabaya is not far from Yogya.)

The palace was built in the 18th century and was once much, much larger. It has been modernised from time to time, but the basic buildings remain the same.


Shame on you, Astro…

…for the most appalling bit of stupid censorship ever.

Folk, did you know that the words “gay” and “lesbian” are in some way either so obscene that we must not sully our delicate ears with the sound of them? Or is it maybe that they are contagious? We hear them and instantly change our orientation, perhaps? Who would have thunk it! Astro, that’s who. (Maybe, if that was true, there might be one whole lot less bigotry and vicious hatred against all those with non-hetero orientation…)

As you all know by now, the movie Milk about the life and murder of a gay activist won two awards at the Oscars, one for the screenplay by Justin Lance Blake and one for the actor, Sean Penn.

Here is part of the acceptance speech of Blake:
But most of all, if Harvey had not been taken from us 30 years ago, I think he’d want me to say to all of the gay and lesbian kids out there tonight who have been told that they are less than by their churches, by the government or by their families, that you are beautiful, wonderful creatures of value and that no matter what anyone tells you, God does love you…

And similarly from Penn:
“For those who saw the signs of hatred as our cars drove in tonight, I think that it is a good time for those who voted for the ban against gay marriage to sit and reflect, and anticipate their great shame, and the shame in their grandchildren’s eyes if they continue that way of support. We’ve got to have equal rights for everyone…

And Astro, who screened the ceremony here in Malaysia, apparently censored both speeches by cutting out the words lesbian and gay. How incredibly silly can you get.

You can read the whole thing here, including a lovely piece of writing from a gay Malaysian who brought it to the attention of Bibliobibuli.

UPDATE (via Bibliobibuli)
In the interest of accuracy, it seems that it was STAR that actually did the silly censorship, and passed it on to its customers, including Astro.

The labour in the love of writing

My first book was written in pencil on a letter pad. It was about a bunch of kids on a farm (just like the one I lived on) having adventures, and it was never finished. I was about ten or so at the time.

My second was written in an exercise book with a fountain pen. It was illustrated, I remember. I was twelve and I did finish that one. It was a love story/historical novel set in Scotland (where I had never been),which I wrote just after I had just read a couple of books set, guess where, in the Scottish Highlands.

The next books were also handwritten, then laboriously typed on a lightweight portable Olivetti with the aid of a typewriter eraser, because back in those days there was no whiteout. If you made too many mistakes, you re-typed the whole page. Those books were set in Western Australia and I never did anything with them. I eventually bought a very old secondhand electric and used that until they stopped making the ribbon cartridges for it.

That was followed by a new electric that could remember a couple of lines of typing so you could correct them before it printed. I replaced that with a computer in 1981 or thereabouts – Apple 2C – and a dot matrix printer that printed text in one colour: the palest of greys. Green screen, Wordstar and two huge floppies that had to be used at the same time because the RAM was so small. The computer often crashed, and too bad if you had forgotten to save because there was no such thing as automatic backup, and if you saved the wrong thing, too bad, because you couldn’t go backwards either.

I served my time, in other words. I am sure if things were that hard still, there would be a lot less wannabe authors around, because it certainly wasn’t easy to finish a 70,000 word book, let alone one twice that length…

And yet all that was nothing compared to what Irish author Christopher Nolan went through to write some of the most beautiful lines in the English language. Unable to speak or control his muscles, he wrote laboriously tapping out one letter at a time with a pointer attached to his forehead.

He died last week, aged 43. And did you know that U2 wrote a song about him?

Vale, Christopher.

Good news for Malaysian fringe children

Some of you will remember the flak I got from one (anonymous of course) blog reader when I wrote a post, on Children’s Day, about Malaysian street kids. I took the original post down (and another post on yoga and Islam which also upset the same fellow) on the grounds that it doesn’t pay to feed the trolls and I am too old to be bothered with someone who won’t listen.

Ironically enough, I ended up being mainstream on the yoga fatwa issue. Sensible Islamic leaders and commentators intervened and the whole silly affair has been pretty much shelved, especially after the Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi stepped in, telling the national news agency Bernama that Muslims could carry on doing yoga but minus the chanting: “I wish to state that a physical regime with no elements of worship can continue, meaning, it is not banned. I believe that Muslims are not easily swayed into polytheism.” Which was what I had been saying. I guess my irate comment-troll is not very happy with the P.M. either now.

And then there was this in yesterday’s paper, pretty much vindicating what I said about street kids too. This from Sunday Star, 22nd Feb, p9:

“children in education limbo due to uncertainty over their nationality can soon head back to the classrooms. That is, if their parents can show that he or she is a Malaysian with the necessary documented proof from the National Registration Department.”

The Deputy Education Minister commented: “This issue had been repeatedly brought up in Parliament” and that “the Government has made a decision on it.”‘ He also said, “We are simply abiding by Unesco’s principle that children deserve an education.”

Another Assistant Minister said he “had lamented the ‘policy’ among schools to turn away children who had the word “undetermined” written in the column for citizenship in their temporary identification documents.”

Of course, one may still ask why a Malaysian citizen can have the citizenship of her child disputed when they, the parent, have documentation and the child was born within Malaysia, but I am not going to go there again. (Still, I can’t help but wonder how many of those parents with “undetermined” children are cases where the mother is Malaysian and the father not (or absent altogether) rather than the other way around. I figure it’s probably close to 100%, but that’s just me.)

One could also wonder how many Malaysian Muslim prostitutes have the guts to register the birth of a child at the National Registration Department when it would mean they would be charged with illicit intercourse, which is a crime here for Muslims, with incarceration among the likely punishments. The child is always the loser.

I have turned off the comments, also in the interests of not feeding the troll.

The statue…

…was here. You can see it between the door and the mirror.And where is “here”?
The palace of the Sultan of Yogyakarta. And yes, he was at home.
Above and below: more shots taken from the same place, different perspective. More about the palace next week.