Weird stuff from Malaysian politics

.
From the New Sunday Times Nov 1st, 2009, p22.

“I support the Auditor-General’s report but what has happened now is that it gives a very bad impression and it is nauseating. If possible, the government should filter the report before making it a public document.”

–Statement by Datuk Wira Ahmad Hamzah, MP for Jasin

My take:
1. Yes, it does give a bad impression. The reason it gives a bad impression is because a great many people cheated the government and the tax-payer.
2. Yes, it is nauseating. It is nauseating to think this can and does happen.
3. Er, say what? You want to hide the bad things because you don’t want the tax-payer to know that his tax dollars are being stolen?
My conclusion:
1. MPs who want things covered-up give an extremely bad bad impression.
2. MPs who don’t have the moral judgment or the intelligence to realise just how amoral/unintelligent they sound are………..*

* supply your own ending.

_________________________________________

Yesterday’s NaNoWriMo total: 2038

Review of The Last Stormlord

Not sure whether it is quite kosher to post a whole review on the net when I am (obviously) not the author of the review. Anyway: above is the heading of the book review section of the newspaper, so that was really, really great to see for a start!!

The newspaper was The West Australian, Saturday 31st October – the main morning daily in my home town of Perth, which gave me a nice fuzzy feeling.

Ian Nichols, the reviewer is a very talented and polished writer himself, so a good review from him means a lot personally to me.

And here’s some more of the review. It begins:

In her previous novels Larke has demonstrated an enviable skill. With this novel she moves into the realm of sheer virtuosity.

The middle section of the review is a brief look at the story, and then it goes on to say:

The plot is engrossing and the characters fascinating. In bookshops where bland fantasies line the shelves, Larke stands out from the crowd.

Yep, I’m happy.

________________________________________

NaNoWriMo day 1 total: a shade over 2,000 words.

NaNoWriMo

.
I found my writing race with Carol and Helen so helpful that I am joining the write-a-novel-in-a-month folk this year. November – in case you didn’t know – is National Novel Writing Month, where those who sign up strive to write (a very short) novel of 50,000 words.

Of course the aim is not to actually have a saleable novel at the end of it, but rather to have the makings of a whole book which can then be worked on. It’s to using the incentive of a lot of people working towards the same goal to keep your nose in a book. Oh, ok, fingers to the keyboard.

I’ve never done this, but I need the incentive to get STORMLORD’S EXILE* – book 3 of the Watergivers trilogy – towards the finish line.

So if you are part of NaNoWriMo this year, friend me, ok? You’ll find me here. And nudge, poke, encourage and otherwise nag me into getting it done. Well, actually all you will have to do is post your daily totals. I have discovered I am very competitive!

I am only a bit over 60,000 words into the book as the month of November begins, and I hope to double that. So think of me for the next 30 days…

.

Selling women in Kelantan??

In The Star newspaper this week:

___________________

Kelantan* Women, Family and Health committee chairman Wan Ubaidah Omar suggested that awards be given to assemblymen for marrying single mothers should they decide to take another wife.
She said one dilemma facing some single mothers in Kelantan and the country as a whole was that many of them could not register at the Welfare Department or related agencies because their husbands had left them without filing for divorce.**

________________

So… here’s the world according to Wan Ubaidah Omar and the Kelantan Committee for Women, Family and Health:

1. Single mothers need help and we have money to help them. So will we give them the money – or the help? Nope. We’ll give it to a venal man who will marry this worthless woman for money.

Yep sounds like a great solution.

2. An Islamic marriage involves men giving women a dowry, as a safety net. Do we agree with that? Nope. We think men should be given a dowry. With tax payers money.

3. Do we think a single mother can get along without a man? Nope. Should she be helped to be independent and financially viable? Nope. We think she’s better off as an addition to a family, despised by the first wife and her family***.

4. These women are in trouble because men had children by them and then walked out and refused to pay child support. So do we believe in going after these men to pay their debts? Nope. We think the wife should find herself another magnificent specimen of manhood – someone who will marry her if you pay him enough.

Oh, great.

Why isn’t Wan Ubaidah Omar looking for real solutions, including legal ones, for a real problem – instead of suggesting this horror?

__________________________
*One of the northern states of Peninsular Malaysia
**I find that statement hard to believe. I hope the paper got it wrong.

*** And anyone who has ever spoken to women/children in polygamous situations in this country knows the sadness such marriages cause to at least some of the affected.

It’s official: Malaysians think adults don’t read

.
The Malaysian government offers tax relief on books bought, to the tune of $RM 1000 or so per year. (That’s $US 290, or $AUD 325, or Euro 200, or GBP 180.) Wonderful idea, and I congratulate them on encouraging reading.

One of my friends has been claiming religiously every year. She and her husband actually spend a great deal more than that on books. Her house is lined with books and book shelves.

This year the Malaysian Income Tax dept queried the expenditure. When my friends queried why they were being queried, the reply was … (wait for it):

“But you have no small children. How can you possibly be spending so much on books?’

Sigh. Says a lot about what you don’t see when you walk into the average Malaysian house, doesn’t it?
.

I am all in favour of air-brushing

.
Sub-Title: So, is there any lipstick?
__________________________
Remember that photo-Shoot for Her World magazine, November issue?
(Well, it’s out, and it looks great. Better than this scanned image, which doesn’t do it justice.)
Text by Tania Wee, photos by Alvin Liew

Better still, go buy the magazine and read it for yourself. The Deputy Editor of the magazine rang me this evening … I used to dangle her on my knee when she was a gorgeous tot… She’s still gorgeous. I just need the airbrush.

Ah, how time flies.

An abortion, anyone? Absolutely!!

.
This from one of Malaysia’s English language papers Monday, talking about a small remnant forest reserve not far from where I live:

“Since the proposed cemetery project was announced by the previous state government, residents of neighbouring housing estates … had collectively voiced strong objection. They had been calling for the abortion of the project to save the forest reserve from being developed.”

I like this use of the word.

Latest read

Yesterday was such a bad day for half a dozen different reasons, that I didn’t feel like blogging. Shan’t talk about it today either, in the futile hope that the bad things will thus disappear…sigh.

Just finished The Secret Scriptures by Irish writer Sebastian Barry. Apart from a couple of rather wild coincidences that I had a problem with, it was one of those books that aroused my passionate ire on the part of the characters.

How dare the villains of the piece do that! How utterly horrible that conscienceless priest was! I hope he burns in hell. How awful that bitch of a mother-in-law! Oooo – I’d like to give her a piece of my mind. How can people behave like that?!

All over fictional characters… Now that is good writing.

Let’s be politically correct, right?

When I was a very small child, I had a gollywog. You know, one of those black soft toys you take to bed. I loved it, probably because it was soft and fluffy and colourful. Needless to say, I never saw it as a statement of anything at all, and its black face and its hair – which was sort of flat cut strips of cut-felt as I recall – conjured up exactly nobody, let alone a stereotype of an American with a black skin. Hardly surprising, when the years were the 1940s and I was a farm kid without the benefit of TV, who never saw movies of any kind or, let alone black Americans. Nor did I equate it with indigenous Australians.

When I first came to Malaysia, older and wiser, I was shocked to see a toothpaste named Darkie, with a picture of a Black&White minstrel as its logo. I refused to buy it. Most Malaysians saw absolutely nothing racist in it at all.

Racism was not the gollywog or the toothpaste, it was – and is – the reality of how some people treat and regard others. Just as discrimination is more than a change in vocabulary and the futility of wondering whether we should change “manhole” to…er…”personhole”?

That said, I would never buy a gollywog – if they were still available – for a child now. My decision would be on the sole grounds that people find them offensive to those of their cultural grouping. That is enough for me. They are the ones who have suffered, not me, and therefore they have the say, as is right. I have always been a little suspicious of political correctness as a means to addressing societal ills, but if it helps even in small ways, why not.
Sometimes, though, you do wonder just where it will all end. This, via Jennifer Fallon’s blog, as published in the Age. Read the whole article here.

In a revised version of the nursery rhyme that aired recently on the British Broadcasting Corporation’s children’s channel CBeebies, the tale – which first appeared in print in 1810 – no longer ends with “all the king’s horses and all the king’s men/Couldn’t put Humpty together again”. Now, a crack squadron of His Majesty’s finest hard-boiled military personnel has found the recipe to “make Humpty happy again”. How eggsellent.

Soon, no doubt, we’ll be hearing that the three little pigs have invited the big bad wolf to take a quarter share in their organic farming co-op; that a guilt-riddled Jack has atoned for his giant-killing by establishing a golden-goose-funded orphanage for the oversized; and that Hansel and Gretel have gone into the bakery business with a kindly old lady in the remnant old-growth forest of Tasmania.

I am still wondering just what was considered inappropriate about the demise of …um…an egg that was stupid enough to sit on a wall?
.