Weeping for the world

Today CNN had a programme titled Planet in Peril. I didn’t watch it. I decided I wouldn’t be able to bear it. For years, I have worked hard and long to convince folk about things that are so screamingly obvious to me, yet with such little effect…

The only membership-based general conservation organisation in Malaysia has a measly 3,000 plus members out of a population of 23 million people.

And then this CNN report today:
“The Bush administration cleared the way Thursday for federal agencies to skip consultations with government scientists when embarking on projects that could impact endangered wildlife, the interior secretary said.

“The final regulations to the Endangered Species Act take effect before President Bush leaves office in January, but wildlife conservation groups say undoing the damage could take months.

“…the agency in question can satisfy the requirement that no harm will come to an endangered species, then there is no need to consult with either the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Services. The determination of ‘no harm’ will rest with agency bureaucrats instead of scientists…”

To me that is the most shocking, cynical step by a greedy president busily saying thank you to his cronies by giving them permission for a last bit of rape of the country before he bows out. What possible reason could there be to give federal agencies permission to do that unless it is to make it easier for someone to make money somewhere?

I will bestow a prediction on you all, one I will not live long enough to see: 50 years from now, the thing for which the Bush government will be most reviled will not be the Iraq War, or the Katrina mess, or the economic meltdown, or any one of the tens of things he did or didn’t do; it will be for his deliberate lack of attention to both the environment and the biodiversity – of both his own country and the world where the US has an interest.
One of you youngsters can blog about it in my name on December 12th 2058. You, after all, will be the ones who will most suffer for the legacy of the Bush years. See if I am right.

And what are the pix above? Well, last time I went to Lake Bera, it was a thriving resort. Now, so typical of Malaysia, it is dirty and unkempt and untidy. Yep, throw that old urinal out in the camping area, where else? After all, no one wants to waste money on maintenance. The tourists will come without it…won’t they? Hmm? And no one is going to sue us when they fall through the termite-eaten boards of the jetty, will they?

I despair.


Weeping for the world — 4 Comments

  1. I can’t understand it, Glenda. Climate change and the abuse of the world’s resources have been obvious to any thinking person for three or four decades (remember Rachel Carson, anyone?) but our leaders are still blinded by greed and haven’t learnt a thing.

    Yes, let’s all weep.

  2. Matt could never understand why I took such an aversion to Bush, but I discovered his total lack of interest in conservation right from the beginning and hated him for it through the last eight years. Now, his last, disasterous final stroke is enough to make thoughts of assassination pleasant. Trouble is there is so little we can do to stop such rape. I support World Wildlife Fund to the best of my ability, but I feel like a lone voice crying in the wilderness. There just aren’t enough people who give a damn.

    Mind you years ago I was much the same, it wasn’t until conservationists made films which were shown on TV that it made me sit up and take notice. Hopefully a lot of others did too.

    Its not just greed Satima, they just don’t realise or give a damn anyway.

  3. Nothing Bush does can surprise me but, of course, he’s not the only one blinded by greed. It’s happening all over the world. He’s just in a position to implement laws that impact on a vast number of people.

    I’ve always tried to live lightly on the planet but one individual can’t make much of an impact and the despoilers have the ability to do so much damage so quickly.

    I very much doubt that history will be kind to Bush much as he likes to think it will be.

  4. No. I suspect he’ll almost be on a par with Caligula, 1,000 years hence.

    And you’re right, Jo. People just don’t care enough, or are too blind or stupid to see what’s happening.

    But Helen, we can only do what we can as individuals. If all right-thinking people try their best it must make a difference, however small.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.