<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>pseudonyms &#8211; </title>
	<atom:link href="https://glendalarke.com/tag/pseudonyms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://glendalarke.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">166493378</site>	<item>
		<title>Women writers in hiding?</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2010/08/women-writers-in-hiding/</link>
					<comments>https://glendalarke.com/2010/08/women-writers-in-hiding/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenda Larke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[after publication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pseudonyms]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#160;What do you think?? I shall be honest here: I really haven&#8217;t made up my mind because there are pros and cons, and both are persuasive. I think most people agree there are quite a few male readers out there &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="https://glendalarke.com/2010/08/women-writers-in-hiding/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="a2a_button_facebook" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/facebook?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fglendalarke.com%2F2010%2F08%2Fwomen-writers-in-hiding%2F&amp;linkname=Women%20writers%20in%20hiding%3F" title="Facebook" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_button_twitter" href="https://www.addtoany.com/add_to/twitter?linkurl=https%3A%2F%2Fglendalarke.com%2F2010%2F08%2Fwomen-writers-in-hiding%2F&amp;linkname=Women%20writers%20in%20hiding%3F" title="Twitter" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"></a><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save addtoany_share" href="https://www.addtoany.com/share#url=https%3A%2F%2Fglendalarke.com%2F2010%2F08%2Fwomen-writers-in-hiding%2F&#038;title=Women%20writers%20in%20hiding%3F" data-a2a-url="https://glendalarke.com/2010/08/women-writers-in-hiding/" data-a2a-title="Women writers in hiding?"></a></p><p>&nbsp;What do you think??<br />
I shall be honest here: I really haven&#8217;t made up my mind because there are pros and cons, and both are persuasive. </p>
<ol>
<li>I think most people agree there are quite a few male readers out there who won&#8217;t read female authors.&nbsp;</li>
<li>Conversely, there are probably almost no female readers who turn down a book just because it&#8217;s written by a man.&nbsp;</li>
<li>So, should a woman writer use a male or androgynous pseudonym in order to increase her sales?</li>
<li>Or should she stick to her feminist guns, use a female name, and say: &#8220;I&#8217;ll show &#8217;em!&#8221; so that these prejudiced male readers finally realise being a woman has little to do with writing a readable book? (But&#8230;then they&#8217;ll never read it&#8230;)</li>
</ol>
<p>That&#8217;s the first way of &#8220;hiding&#8221; one&#8217;s gender&#8230;and basically it has to do with money and reaching a wider audience. It also has to do with getting published at all. If your sales are too slim, the publisher won&#8217;t pick up your next book. Publishing is a business, folk. Shouldn&#8217;t we do whatever we can to sell? (Too late for me&#8230;I am committed to my female name, partly because at the time it never crossed my mind that there were 20th century men who wouldn&#8217;t read women writers!!)</p>
<p>The second concealment of women writers  is &#8211; some say &#8211; by others&#8230; </p>
<ol>
<li>There has been a great deal of blogging over the years about the lack of novels written by women up for major literary prizes, or short stories written by women accepted for anthologies.&nbsp; Numerous reasons have been given for this and possibly the real reason is a combination of factor all playing a parts: fame, subject matter, prejudice, more male judges, more male writers, &#8230; Perhaps more male judges/editors in the past have regarded &#8220;female&#8221; family or domestic issues as less worthy when compared to larger &#8220;male&#8221; issues. This of course presupposes that women don&#8217;t write so much about large issues and men writers avoid domestic issues.</li>
<li>So, should there be prizes just for &#8220;women&#8217;s&#8221; fiction, i.e. by women writers? Such as the Orange Prize?&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<p>No! That implies women aren&#8217;t as good as males, worthy of competing for the &#8220;real&#8221; literary prizes, like the Man Booker! Yes! There should be separate prizes for women&#8217;s fiction in order to get the recognition women deserve for both their issues and their writing! Otherwise we won&#8217;t be aware of their top-notch work&#8230;</p>
<ol></ol>
<p>&nbsp;So what do you think?</p>
<p>Comment here and/or answer on the two poll questions in the sidebar&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://glendalarke.com/2010/08/women-writers-in-hiding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3370</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
