<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The mystery of the missing middle book &#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://glendalarke.com/2013/08/the-mystery-of-the-missing-middle-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://glendalarke.com/2013/08/the-mystery-of-the-missing-middle-book/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 21:11:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: GLENDA LARKE		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2013/08/the-mystery-of-the-missing-middle-book/#comment-8023</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GLENDA LARKE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://glendalarke.com/?p=112#comment-8023</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, and there are a lot more replies over on my blog here: http://glendalarke.blogspot.com.au/2006/03/mystery-of-missing-middle-book.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and there are a lot more replies over on my blog here: <a href="http://glendalarke.blogspot.com.au/2006/03/mystery-of-missing-middle-book.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://glendalarke.blogspot.com.au/2006/03/mystery-of-missing-middle-book.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: GLENDA LARKE		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2013/08/the-mystery-of-the-missing-middle-book/#comment-8022</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GLENDA LARKE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://glendalarke.com/?p=112#comment-8022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s an interesting reply; thanks Pheonix. I think you could be right too.

I also think -- from personal experience -- that publishers give a lot of publicity to the first and the third books, but because they have limited budgets for publicity, tend to neglect the middle one and put what they have left into Vol 3, making the assumption, perhaps, that no one will buy the last one if they haven&#039;t also bought the middle one!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting reply; thanks Pheonix. I think you could be right too.</p>
<p>I also think &#8212; from personal experience &#8212; that publishers give a lot of publicity to the first and the third books, but because they have limited budgets for publicity, tend to neglect the middle one and put what they have left into Vol 3, making the assumption, perhaps, that no one will buy the last one if they haven&#8217;t also bought the middle one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pheonix023		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2013/08/the-mystery-of-the-missing-middle-book/#comment-6861</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pheonix023]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 06:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://glendalarke.com/?p=112#comment-6861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know this post is from a few years ago, but it doesn&#039;t look like anyone sent an answer, and it is a great question, so i thought &quot;why not?&quot;  Also, since I generally LOVE to read just about any book I can get my hands on, I might actually know the answer to this one....

Usually (not saying this is always true), the first book of any trilogy ends on a fairly positive note, because an author doesn&#039;t know how well its going to do, or if they will get to expand on the story...same goes for the third book because it is the end, and everything has to get wrapped up with an ending that leaves everyone satisfied.

The second book is generally where everything goes to hell in a hand basket, and tends to end on a cliffhanger.  While in my personal case, there is no more beautiful thing in the world than &quot;and then it got worse,&quot;  I think a lot of people just want to feel good, and don&#039;t get that instant gratification from the second book in any given trilogy....even though it is necessary part of the story to make it feel like the characters really deserve whatever happens to them in the next book.

And then it just comes down to laziness.... people say, &quot;oh no, what&#039;s gonna happen next?  That was so (insert emotion here)...I think I&#039;ll wait till the next book comes out, in 6-12 months, and then if the ending is good, I&#039;ll buy them both!&quot;  And guess what.  The next book comes out, they get excited, buy it, read it, and then never remember to pick up the second one.  Silly, right?

Or the other possibility, they&#039;ve had their faith shattered in the past by series that were supposed to be a &quot;trilogy&quot;, that then drags out for 4,5,6,7+ books....and want to MAKE SURE there is only 3 before they start buying them all....and forget to pick up number two.

They really just need to have a little more faith in their favorite authors, and buy the second book when it comes out.

That said, your writing is just wonderful, particularly liked the Watergiver trilogy, its VERY high (in fact, at the top) of my list of books I think would make wonderful movies ....brilliant storytelling.  Looking forward to &quot;The Dagger&#039;s Path&quot; coming gout in January!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this post is from a few years ago, but it doesn&#8217;t look like anyone sent an answer, and it is a great question, so i thought &#8220;why not?&#8221;  Also, since I generally LOVE to read just about any book I can get my hands on, I might actually know the answer to this one&#8230;.</p>
<p>Usually (not saying this is always true), the first book of any trilogy ends on a fairly positive note, because an author doesn&#8217;t know how well its going to do, or if they will get to expand on the story&#8230;same goes for the third book because it is the end, and everything has to get wrapped up with an ending that leaves everyone satisfied.</p>
<p>The second book is generally where everything goes to hell in a hand basket, and tends to end on a cliffhanger.  While in my personal case, there is no more beautiful thing in the world than &#8220;and then it got worse,&#8221;  I think a lot of people just want to feel good, and don&#8217;t get that instant gratification from the second book in any given trilogy&#8230;.even though it is necessary part of the story to make it feel like the characters really deserve whatever happens to them in the next book.</p>
<p>And then it just comes down to laziness&#8230;. people say, &#8220;oh no, what&#8217;s gonna happen next?  That was so (insert emotion here)&#8230;I think I&#8217;ll wait till the next book comes out, in 6-12 months, and then if the ending is good, I&#8217;ll buy them both!&#8221;  And guess what.  The next book comes out, they get excited, buy it, read it, and then never remember to pick up the second one.  Silly, right?</p>
<p>Or the other possibility, they&#8217;ve had their faith shattered in the past by series that were supposed to be a &#8220;trilogy&#8221;, that then drags out for 4,5,6,7+ books&#8230;.and want to MAKE SURE there is only 3 before they start buying them all&#8230;.and forget to pick up number two.</p>
<p>They really just need to have a little more faith in their favorite authors, and buy the second book when it comes out.</p>
<p>That said, your writing is just wonderful, particularly liked the Watergiver trilogy, its VERY high (in fact, at the top) of my list of books I think would make wonderful movies &#8230;.brilliant storytelling.  Looking forward to &#8220;The Dagger&#8217;s Path&#8221; coming gout in January!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
