<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A New Genre??????	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://glendalarke.com/2010/08/new-genre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://glendalarke.com/2010/08/new-genre/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: glenda larke		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2010/08/new-genre/#comment-19530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glenda larke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 07:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Satima -  no, I didn&#039;t leave anything on the NPR blog, but she had already copped it from several other irate SF/F readers!!

I was actually the opposite to you, Jo. Fantasy was fine, but SF was a no-no. &#034;Everyone&#034; agreed when I was growing up that SF was all about ideas but the writing was terrible. Schools wouldn&#039;t put it on the curriculum! And school librarians often shunned it like the plague.

Fantasy was more respectable, perhaps because of Tolkien and Lewis who were Oxford dons, don&#039;tyouknow...(said in posh voice..., but there really wasn&#039;t much of it being written for adults as I was growing up in the 50s.

For SF:

They allowed Animal Farm (1945) because it was an allegory, and 1984 (1949) because it hit at totalitarian regimes; Huxley because he was from a respectable, famous family and was an intellectual, (Brave New World 1932)...

Apart from the above exceptions, and &#034;historical&#034; writers like Verne and Wells, perhaps the first really  pure SF book to hit my generation that was also &#034;respected&#034; by the traditional educational establishment, was Fahrenheit 451 (1953).

The greats of the period - Asimov, Heinlein etc were all ignored and heaven help you if you wanted to do a book report on any of their writing...

As a consequence, I too bought into this and believed what I was told, and therefore came late to the genre.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satima &#8211;  no, I didn&#39;t leave anything on the NPR blog, but she had already copped it from several other irate SF/F readers!!</p>
<p>I was actually the opposite to you, Jo. Fantasy was fine, but SF was a no-no. &quot;Everyone&quot; agreed when I was growing up that SF was all about ideas but the writing was terrible. Schools wouldn&#39;t put it on the curriculum! And school librarians often shunned it like the plague.</p>
<p>Fantasy was more respectable, perhaps because of Tolkien and Lewis who were Oxford dons, don&#39;tyouknow&#8230;(said in posh voice&#8230;, but there really wasn&#39;t much of it being written for adults as I was growing up in the 50s.</p>
<p>For SF:</p>
<p>They allowed Animal Farm (1945) because it was an allegory, and 1984 (1949) because it hit at totalitarian regimes; Huxley because he was from a respectable, famous family and was an intellectual, (Brave New World 1932)&#8230;</p>
<p>Apart from the above exceptions, and &quot;historical&quot; writers like Verne and Wells, perhaps the first really  pure SF book to hit my generation that was also &quot;respected&quot; by the traditional educational establishment, was Fahrenheit 451 (1953).</p>
<p>The greats of the period &#8211; Asimov, Heinlein etc were all ignored and heaven help you if you wanted to do a book report on any of their writing&#8230;</p>
<p>As a consequence, I too bought into this and believed what I was told, and therefore came late to the genre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jo		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2010/08/new-genre/#comment-19529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 06:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is a fact that for years I didn&#039;t touch fantasy writing because I was &#039;brung&#039; up to believe it was trashy. I don&#039;t even remember now who&#039;s book was the first one I read in this genre, but obviously I enjoyed it as I am still devouring such stories. I know I started with sci fi reading Asimov and Ray Bradbury, I must have just drifted into fantasy I think.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a fact that for years I didn&#39;t touch fantasy writing because I was &#39;brung&#39; up to believe it was trashy. I don&#39;t even remember now who&#39;s book was the first one I read in this genre, but obviously I enjoyed it as I am still devouring such stories. I know I started with sci fi reading Asimov and Ray Bradbury, I must have just drifted into fantasy I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Helen V.		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2010/08/new-genre/#comment-19528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helen V.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It comes back snobbery about genre writing - as if a something can only be well written if it is &#039;literary&#039; which is patently rubbish.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It comes back snobbery about genre writing &#8211; as if a something can only be well written if it is &#39;literary&#39; which is patently rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Satima Flavell		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2010/08/new-genre/#comment-19527</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satima Flavell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good  for you, Glenda.  I hope you posted your opinion on Ms Pearl&#039;s blog, if she has one!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good  for you, Glenda.  I hope you posted your opinion on Ms Pearl&#39;s blog, if she has one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
