<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: No one religion has a monopoly&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://glendalarke.com/2010/01/no-one-religion-has-monopoly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://glendalarke.com/2010/01/no-one-religion-has-monopoly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:30:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Glenda Larke		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2010/01/no-one-religion-has-monopoly/#comment-20151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenda Larke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 05:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Did he really say that, Satima? Wow!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did he really say that, Satima? Wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Satima Flavell		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2010/01/no-one-religion-has-monopoly/#comment-20150</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satima Flavell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As Yasser Arafat once put it &#034;fighting over who has the best imaginary friend.&#034;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Yasser Arafat once put it &quot;fighting over who has the best imaginary friend.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jo		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2010/01/no-one-religion-has-monopoly/#comment-20149</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Religion has attracted idiots since the concept began. Just look at the Crusades to start off with. I do agree Sci Fi makes you THINK and thinking is a good thing anyway. Natural Science could do the same thing couldn&#039;t it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Religion has attracted idiots since the concept began. Just look at the Crusades to start off with. I do agree Sci Fi makes you THINK and thinking is a good thing anyway. Natural Science could do the same thing couldn&#39;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2010/01/no-one-religion-has-monopoly/#comment-20148</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20148</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Remarkable. I wonder if the same folk so upset at non-Muslims using the word &#039;Allah&#039; are, in the spirit of avoiding hypocrisy, willing to give up using words such &#039;intellect&#039;, &#039;perspective&#039; and &#039;common sense&#039;, for surely they have no legitimate claim on such concepts.

Interesting, too, to note that all of the &#039;sci-fi&#039; authors mentioned in this creationist idiot&#039;s article are dead and, therefore, unable to answer back. Gosh, it must be nice to have such moral courage . . .

Beware of Science Fiction! It might make you think - and then you&#039;ll see through the transparent tissue of lies upon which my entire argument is constructed . . .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remarkable. I wonder if the same folk so upset at non-Muslims using the word &#39;Allah&#39; are, in the spirit of avoiding hypocrisy, willing to give up using words such &#39;intellect&#39;, &#39;perspective&#39; and &#39;common sense&#39;, for surely they have no legitimate claim on such concepts.</p>
<p>Interesting, too, to note that all of the &#39;sci-fi&#39; authors mentioned in this creationist idiot&#39;s article are dead and, therefore, unable to answer back. Gosh, it must be nice to have such moral courage . . .</p>
<p>Beware of Science Fiction! It might make you think &#8211; and then you&#39;ll see through the transparent tissue of lies upon which my entire argument is constructed . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
