<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More on the problem of recap&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://glendalarke.com/2009/05/more-on-writing-problem-of-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://glendalarke.com/2009/05/more-on-writing-problem-of-recap/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:33:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Glenda Larke		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2009/05/more-on-writing-problem-of-recap/#comment-20946</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenda Larke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PeterM - thanks!

I quite enjoyed Royal Exile, although perhaps I enjoy a more character-driven plot than a plot-driven story. Fiona always has great ideas about the magic in her worlds, though. And lots of blood and gore.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PeterM &#8211; thanks!</p>
<p>I quite enjoyed Royal Exile, although perhaps I enjoy a more character-driven plot than a plot-driven story. Fiona always has great ideas about the magic in her worlds, though. And lots of blood and gore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PeterM		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2009/05/more-on-writing-problem-of-recap/#comment-20945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PeterM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I voted both for a glossary and the subtle recapping of the narrative. I agree with Jo, that if you included a glossary at the end then you could keep a list of major and minor characters, and the magic&#039;s/world&#039;s terminology.

Although, having recently finished the Mirage Makers (which I loved, by the way), I found myself remembering what had happened in previous books, despite the many months between each volume. As they did not have a glossary, you must have been subtly recapping, so just keep doing what you&#039;re doing!

Also, I noticed that you have recently read Fiona McIntosh&#039;s Royal Exile. Having started it last night, I was wondering what you thought of it?

Peter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted both for a glossary and the subtle recapping of the narrative. I agree with Jo, that if you included a glossary at the end then you could keep a list of major and minor characters, and the magic&#8217;s/world&#8217;s terminology.</p>
<p>Although, having recently finished the Mirage Makers (which I loved, by the way), I found myself remembering what had happened in previous books, despite the many months between each volume. As they did not have a glossary, you must have been subtly recapping, so just keep doing what you&#8217;re doing!</p>
<p>Also, I noticed that you have recently read Fiona McIntosh&#8217;s Royal Exile. Having started it last night, I was wondering what you thought of it?</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sarah		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2009/05/more-on-writing-problem-of-recap/#comment-20944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m reading Robin Hobb&#039;s Liveship trilogy at the moment and, halfway through the third or so chapter, realised she had been subtly recapping. It was done in a way that retold what had already happened while adding little bits and pieces that happened in the meantime which meant that the reader wasnt just being told &#039;here&#039;s what happened, and then this and this and this&#039;, but was integrating it with new information.

I voted for both a synopsis and a glossary, but in both your other trilogies you manage to re cap seamlessly. I especially recall and appreciated the glossary in the isles of glory books - I read through it at the end and kept saying &#039;Ohh, thats right!&#039;

I figure just keep doin&#039; what you&#039;re doin&#039;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reading Robin Hobb&#8217;s Liveship trilogy at the moment and, halfway through the third or so chapter, realised she had been subtly recapping. It was done in a way that retold what had already happened while adding little bits and pieces that happened in the meantime which meant that the reader wasnt just being told &#8216;here&#8217;s what happened, and then this and this and this&#8217;, but was integrating it with new information.</p>
<p>I voted for both a synopsis and a glossary, but in both your other trilogies you manage to re cap seamlessly. I especially recall and appreciated the glossary in the isles of glory books &#8211; I read through it at the end and kept saying &#8216;Ohh, thats right!&#8217;</p>
<p>I figure just keep doin&#8217; what you&#8217;re doin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jo		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2009/05/more-on-writing-problem-of-recap/#comment-20943</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-20943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I voted for a synopsis at the beginning, but a glossary at the end isn&#039;t a bad idea, so long as its referenced in the index. If there are so many different people doing different types of magic, maybe an explanation in the glossary would be a good idea. 

One thing I hate is maps that actually don&#039;t show you where the characters are except very generally. Why bother.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted for a synopsis at the beginning, but a glossary at the end isn&#8217;t a bad idea, so long as its referenced in the index. If there are so many different people doing different types of magic, maybe an explanation in the glossary would be a good idea. </p>
<p>One thing I hate is maps that actually don&#8217;t show you where the characters are except very generally. Why bother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
