<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Reading and travel	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://glendalarke.com/2008/09/reading-and-travel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/09/reading-and-travel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/09/reading-and-travel/#comment-21823</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21823</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Haha!  I loved this post, particularly the list of your neighbour&#039;s reading selections.  Dear, dear.  I wish I could hand out Dawkins too but the problem is that we won&#039;t convince anyone with logic, since their whole *point* is that their beliefs are exempt from the laws of logic.  It&#039;s impossible to have a logical argument with anyone who has already ruled out logic as a method of approaching the universe.  In fact, I&#039;ve even heard (and very recently) this lobbied as an accusation: &quot;Who does he think he is, using his own logic, when it already says XYZ in [insert Holy Book of choice]?  So disrespectful!&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;-- Preeta]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha!  I loved this post, particularly the list of your neighbour&#8217;s reading selections.  Dear, dear.  I wish I could hand out Dawkins too but the problem is that we won&#8217;t convince anyone with logic, since their whole *point* is that their beliefs are exempt from the laws of logic.  It&#8217;s impossible to have a logical argument with anyone who has already ruled out logic as a method of approaching the universe.  In fact, I&#8217;ve even heard (and very recently) this lobbied as an accusation: &#8220;Who does he think he is, using his own logic, when it already says XYZ in [insert Holy Book of choice]?  So disrespectful!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212; Preeta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: glenda larke		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/09/reading-and-travel/#comment-21822</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glenda larke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21822</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lost any friends since, Alex?? Lol...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost any friends since, Alex?? Lol&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/09/reading-and-travel/#comment-21821</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 04:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-21821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m giving &quot;The God Delusion&quot; as birthdays nowadays... :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m giving &#8220;The God Delusion&#8221; as birthdays nowadays&#8230; 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
