<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rejection Letter	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://glendalarke.com/2008/07/rejection-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/07/rejection-letter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:34:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: glenda larke		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/07/rejection-letter/#comment-22209</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glenda larke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, Satima, that&#039;a another book I have to try sometime...but my TBR pile is already so high I can&#039;t see over the top of it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Satima, that&#8217;a another book I have to try sometime&#8230;but my TBR pile is already so high I can&#8217;t see over the top of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Satima Flavell		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/07/rejection-letter/#comment-22208</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satima Flavell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does it start with V? Oh no...&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Speaking of &quot;turning out OK&quot; I am raving about Joe Abercrombie&#039;s first trilogy, The First Law. Almost *nothing* turns out OK! He takes every Fantasy trope and every stock character and rotates them not-quite 180%. It&#039;s brilliant. Not 1st person, though: multiple close third. But every POV is distinctive and original.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it start with V? Oh no&#8230;</p>
<p>Speaking of &#8220;turning out OK&#8221; I am raving about Joe Abercrombie&#8217;s first trilogy, The First Law. Almost *nothing* turns out OK! He takes every Fantasy trope and every stock character and rotates them not-quite 180%. It&#8217;s brilliant. Not 1st person, though: multiple close third. But every POV is distinctive and original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Glenda Larke		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/07/rejection-letter/#comment-22207</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenda Larke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Both reasons are vacuous, aren&#039;t they, Satima? First of all, &quot;turning out ok&quot; is subjective. All sorts of bad endings can still leave the narrator able to tell his/her story; and the second reason is just plain silly, as you have indicated. A third reason given to me is: &quot;Oh it means the story is too linear and you only get one PoV&quot;. Rubbish. It depends on how skilful the author is. Anyone who thinks that it ends up as a linear boring tale that is never going to sell, should look at Robin Hobb&#039;s Assassin&#039;s trilogy.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;But then, you know who published the UK edition of that? &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;You guessed it!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both reasons are vacuous, aren&#8217;t they, Satima? First of all, &#8220;turning out ok&#8221; is subjective. All sorts of bad endings can still leave the narrator able to tell his/her story; and the second reason is just plain silly, as you have indicated. A third reason given to me is: &#8220;Oh it means the story is too linear and you only get one PoV&#8221;. Rubbish. It depends on how skilful the author is. Anyone who thinks that it ends up as a linear boring tale that is never going to sell, should look at Robin Hobb&#8217;s Assassin&#8217;s trilogy.</p>
<p>But then, you know who published the UK edition of that? </p>
<p>You guessed it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Satima Flavell		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/07/rejection-letter/#comment-22206</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satima Flavell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is my second try. I am making even more typos than usual this morning.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;That sure beats the &quot;not suitable for our current list&quot; form letter:-) Although, to paraphrase what Jo says, manure by any other name still smells as nasty.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Many of my favourite books are written in the first person, and I read recently on Writer Unboxed that the 1st POV is making a comeback. However, I&#039;ve met many people who don&#039;t like it, usually for one of two reasons: a)If the person is telling the story, we can surmise that everything turned out OK because s/he is still alive and b) reading in the first person feels as if you have to think the character&#039;s thoughts instead of your own, which feels invasive. Yet these same people love the close 3rd POV because it makes them feel what the character feels. You can&#039;t win, eh?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my second try. I am making even more typos than usual this morning.</p>
<p>That sure beats the &#8220;not suitable for our current list&#8221; form letter:-) Although, to paraphrase what Jo says, manure by any other name still smells as nasty.</p>
<p>Many of my favourite books are written in the first person, and I read recently on Writer Unboxed that the 1st POV is making a comeback. However, I&#8217;ve met many people who don&#8217;t like it, usually for one of two reasons: a)If the person is telling the story, we can surmise that everything turned out OK because s/he is still alive and b) reading in the first person feels as if you have to think the character&#8217;s thoughts instead of your own, which feels invasive. Yet these same people love the close 3rd POV because it makes them feel what the character feels. You can&#8217;t win, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Satima Flavell		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/07/rejection-letter/#comment-22205</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satima Flavell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This comment has been removed by the author.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment has been removed by the author.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jo		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/07/rejection-letter/#comment-22204</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice or not, a rejection is still a rejection. I just hope you don&#039;t get any more. As ru says, stay stubborn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice or not, a rejection is still a rejection. I just hope you don&#8217;t get any more. As ru says, stay stubborn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hrugaar		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/07/rejection-letter/#comment-22203</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hrugaar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice rejection letter ... a fine subtlety complimenting the author while performing &#039;keyhole gralloching&#039; on the publishers for their unenlightened greed (by implication wanting the world handed to them on a - presumably third person - plate).&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Still, I&#039;d rather you didn&#039;t get any more rejection letters for a while - not even ones as nice as this.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Stay stubborn. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice rejection letter &#8230; a fine subtlety complimenting the author while performing &#8216;keyhole gralloching&#8217; on the publishers for their unenlightened greed (by implication wanting the world handed to them on a &#8211; presumably third person &#8211; plate).</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;d rather you didn&#8217;t get any more rejection letters for a while &#8211; not even ones as nice as this.</p>
<p>Stay stubborn. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
