<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Writing, not reading?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://glendalarke.com/2008/05/writing-not-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/05/writing-not-reading/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:34:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Glenda Larke		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/05/writing-not-reading/#comment-22547</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenda Larke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You guys all have wise things to say. Very true.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;On the down side, I think we are becoming a world where people find it hard to be stimulated by their own imaginations - we receive sounds and images already conceived for us all the time, instead of doing it ourselves. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Reading requires the reader to imagine. So does writing. For some reason I can&#039;t explain, we are dropping one form of stimulation (reading), yet upping our interest in another more challenging form - writing, which requires imagination plus creation. Perhaps that says something about our world...we need creativity more than we need a more passive mental stimulation?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys all have wise things to say. Very true.</p>
<p>On the down side, I think we are becoming a world where people find it hard to be stimulated by their own imaginations &#8211; we receive sounds and images already conceived for us all the time, instead of doing it ourselves. </p>
<p>Reading requires the reader to imagine. So does writing. For some reason I can&#8217;t explain, we are dropping one form of stimulation (reading), yet upping our interest in another more challenging form &#8211; writing, which requires imagination plus creation. Perhaps that says something about our world&#8230;we need creativity more than we need a more passive mental stimulation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/05/writing-not-reading/#comment-22546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think that a lot of people these days want instant gratification without the hard grind of learning, research, mistakes, rejection and polishing of their art or trade. Hence the growth of fringe publishers to meet this need.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Most of the bios I have read of popular writers have had one thing in common: they have all started in childhood with a love of reading and eventually writing their own stories.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that a lot of people these days want instant gratification without the hard grind of learning, research, mistakes, rejection and polishing of their art or trade. Hence the growth of fringe publishers to meet this need.</p>
<p>Most of the bios I have read of popular writers have had one thing in common: they have all started in childhood with a love of reading and eventually writing their own stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/05/writing-not-reading/#comment-22545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think there are two processes at work here. The article mentions that many people write &#039;for personal fulfilment&#039;. I think that a lot of people start out like this. They just write for fun (even if they think they&#039;re serious). I don&#039;t think that &#039;having&#039; to read is mandatory for that. As hrugaar says, many things vie for our sparse leisure time.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;However, I think as the non-reading writer progresses from wanting to write &#039;for fun&#039; to &#039;wanting to get published&#039;, reading becomes a greater necessity. Here, I agree with all points you make.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Having been a non-reading writer for a bit, I sympathise with the other side. With a full-time job and three kids under six, I simply hadn&#039;t the peace and quiet to read. I chose to spend my time in other ways. I wrote a bit for fun.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Now I&#039;m getting more serious and I know that reading is important. It&#039;s enjoyable, too... if you have the time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are two processes at work here. The article mentions that many people write &#8216;for personal fulfilment&#8217;. I think that a lot of people start out like this. They just write for fun (even if they think they&#8217;re serious). I don&#8217;t think that &#8216;having&#8217; to read is mandatory for that. As hrugaar says, many things vie for our sparse leisure time.</p>
<p>However, I think as the non-reading writer progresses from wanting to write &#8216;for fun&#8217; to &#8216;wanting to get published&#8217;, reading becomes a greater necessity. Here, I agree with all points you make.</p>
<p>Having been a non-reading writer for a bit, I sympathise with the other side. With a full-time job and three kids under six, I simply hadn&#8217;t the peace and quiet to read. I chose to spend my time in other ways. I wrote a bit for fun.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m getting more serious and I know that reading is important. It&#8217;s enjoyable, too&#8230; if you have the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hrugaar		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2008/05/writing-not-reading/#comment-22544</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hrugaar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-22544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Two thoughts here.  The more cynical one is that there have always been people who are more interested in what they have to say than in listening to what other people are saying. :&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The second is that the entertainment media (TV, radio, newspapers, movies, theatre, music industry, internet etc.) already bombard us with a huge amount of stuff, even if we don&#039;t get the time to sit down and read books; but for the average person wanting to respond with their own thoughts and ideas, writing (a book, a blog, whatever) is perhaps the most readily accessible means of communication.  We may not have the skills or resources to make movies, for example, or express ourselves through material arts like painting and sculpture, but just sitting down and writing is (as you say) easily within our reach.  In such cases it is perhaps not so much about wanting to enter a particular literary circle or genre, but more like the readiest way to respond to the barrage of ideas from a whole variety of sources.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Also we have had the saying for many years that everyone has at least one book inside them that they could write; so perhaps it is not so much the urge to write that is new, but having the means available to do so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two thoughts here.  The more cynical one is that there have always been people who are more interested in what they have to say than in listening to what other people are saying. :</p>
<p>The second is that the entertainment media (TV, radio, newspapers, movies, theatre, music industry, internet etc.) already bombard us with a huge amount of stuff, even if we don&#8217;t get the time to sit down and read books; but for the average person wanting to respond with their own thoughts and ideas, writing (a book, a blog, whatever) is perhaps the most readily accessible means of communication.  We may not have the skills or resources to make movies, for example, or express ourselves through material arts like painting and sculpture, but just sitting down and writing is (as you say) easily within our reach.  In such cases it is perhaps not so much about wanting to enter a particular literary circle or genre, but more like the readiest way to respond to the barrage of ideas from a whole variety of sources.</p>
<p>Also we have had the saying for many years that everyone has at least one book inside them that they could write; so perhaps it is not so much the urge to write that is new, but having the means available to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
