<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The worst things about a Trilogy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://glendalarke.com/2006/10/worst-things-about-trilogy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://glendalarke.com/2006/10/worst-things-about-trilogy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Glenda Larke		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2006/10/worst-things-about-trilogy/#comment-24538</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenda Larke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It must be tough to win a major prize early in your career. What do you do for an encore?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be tough to win a major prize early in your career. What do you do for an encore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ink paw prints		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2006/10/worst-things-about-trilogy/#comment-24537</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ink paw prints]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[was thinking about the prize thing, and I think that the true prize would be being able to say that &quot;[x] number of people read &amp; enjoy my books, and slowly but surely other people are buying them and then buying more. I have a growing career as a writer.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Cos after all, most prize winning authors seem to vanish.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was thinking about the prize thing, and I think that the true prize would be being able to say that &#8220;[x] number of people read &#038; enjoy my books, and slowly but surely other people are buying them and then buying more. I have a growing career as a writer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cos after all, most prize winning authors seem to vanish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2006/10/worst-things-about-trilogy/#comment-24536</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24536</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah...the publisher cited lackluster sales.  ;-(  Apparently book 1 was the second of a 2-book contract, so I guess they had no contractual obligation to continue when sales weren&#039;t good enough.  (Ironically, the editor has suggested the author do a trilogy!  D&#039;oh....)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;the publisher cited lackluster sales.  ;-(  Apparently book 1 was the second of a 2-book contract, so I guess they had no contractual obligation to continue when sales weren&#8217;t good enough.  (Ironically, the editor has suggested the author do a trilogy!  D&#8217;oh&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Glenda Larke		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2006/10/worst-things-about-trilogy/#comment-24535</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenda Larke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Simon, I&#039;m jealous. Sf writers have it better when it comes to length and series.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Kendall, you mean they advertised the book as a trilogy and then, after publication,  announced there weren&#039;t going to be any more? Weird. And not playing fair with readers.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I do know of a NZ fantasy author who abandoned his trilogy after publication had started. He&#039;d decided to do something else and just walked away. He found it easy because the publisher had only been signing him up for one book at a time...&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;But where&#039;s the responsibility to the reader?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I am looking forward to reading the Desai book, Sharon. Sounds like a great read. When i have this darn tome of my finished.....grr]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, I&#8217;m jealous. Sf writers have it better when it comes to length and series.</p>
<p>Kendall, you mean they advertised the book as a trilogy and then, after publication,  announced there weren&#8217;t going to be any more? Weird. And not playing fair with readers.</p>
<p>I do know of a NZ fantasy author who abandoned his trilogy after publication had started. He&#8217;d decided to do something else and just walked away. He found it easy because the publisher had only been signing him up for one book at a time&#8230;</p>
<p>But where&#8217;s the responsibility to the reader?</p>
<p>I am looking forward to reading the Desai book, Sharon. Sounds like a great read. When i have this darn tome of my finished&#8230;..grr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bibliobibuli		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2006/10/worst-things-about-trilogy/#comment-24534</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bibliobibuli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 07:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[actually kiran desai probably could have split her book into three volumes - there&#039;s so much story there!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually kiran desai probably could have split her book into three volumes &#8211; there&#8217;s so much story there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2006/10/worst-things-about-trilogy/#comment-24533</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24533</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not even close, Glenda.  ;-)  Here&#039;s the worst:&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I loved a stand-alone SF novel by a new (to me) author.  I bought their stand-alone first book.  Their upcoming series sounded cool, so I bought book 1 when it came out.  (Support the author!  Help sales numbers!  Don&#039;t get burned again!).  I finally read their first book &amp; loved it, and started that book 1 of trilogy...only to discover, after 50 pages, that &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://blog.synemitchell.com/2006/10/last-mortal-manreally-is.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;there won&#039;t be a book 2 or 3&lt;/A&gt;.  ;-(  (In fairness, Syne Mitchell said she tied most things up in book 1, so perhaps it doesn&#039;t count for this purpose.  I think it counts, but I stayed out of the semantic discussion of what a trilogy is.)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Second0 worst would be if 2 books came out and &lt;EM&gt;then&lt;/EM&gt; the publisher dropped the trilogy/series.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I think what you describe is a distant third worst, but I think I have more patience than most and I&#039;m used to how it works (isn&#039;t everyone? ;-).  Del Rey &amp; Naomi Novik are exceptions to the spaced apart releases; they released books 1, 2, &amp; 3 a month apart each in the U.S.  I hope it worked out well for them.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I&#039;ve never &lt;EM&gt;planned&lt;/EM&gt; to wait till all three books come out before starting to read.  I &lt;EM&gt;have&lt;/EM&gt; read book 1, bought book 2, not gotten to it, and bought book 3 based on confidence in book 1.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;But unless it was a favorite author, I doubt I&#039;d buy more than one book in a series without even reading the first.  I&#039;ve probably done it &lt;EM&gt;once&lt;/EM&gt;; there&#039;s always that pesky exception.... ;-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not even close, Glenda.  😉  Here&#8217;s the worst:</p>
<p>I loved a stand-alone SF novel by a new (to me) author.  I bought their stand-alone first book.  Their upcoming series sounded cool, so I bought book 1 when it came out.  (Support the author!  Help sales numbers!  Don&#8217;t get burned again!).  I finally read their first book &#038; loved it, and started that book 1 of trilogy&#8230;only to discover, after 50 pages, that <a HREF="http://blog.synemitchell.com/2006/10/last-mortal-manreally-is.html" REL="nofollow">there won&#8217;t be a book 2 or 3</a>.  ;-(  (In fairness, Syne Mitchell said she tied most things up in book 1, so perhaps it doesn&#8217;t count for this purpose.  I think it counts, but I stayed out of the semantic discussion of what a trilogy is.)</p>
<p>Second0 worst would be if 2 books came out and <em>then</em> the publisher dropped the trilogy/series.</p>
<p>I think what you describe is a distant third worst, but I think I have more patience than most and I&#8217;m used to how it works (isn&#8217;t everyone? ;-).  Del Rey &#038; Naomi Novik are exceptions to the spaced apart releases; they released books 1, 2, &#038; 3 a month apart each in the U.S.  I hope it worked out well for them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never <em>planned</em> to wait till all three books come out before starting to read.  I <em>have</em> read book 1, bought book 2, not gotten to it, and bought book 3 based on confidence in book 1.</p>
<p>But unless it was a favorite author, I doubt I&#8217;d buy more than one book in a series without even reading the first.  I&#8217;ve probably done it <em>once</em>; there&#8217;s always that pesky exception&#8230;. 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Simon Haynes		</title>
		<link>https://glendalarke.com/2006/10/worst-things-about-trilogy/#comment-24532</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Haynes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-24532</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was lucky with my first three books - I&#039;d written them all by the time a publisher expressed any interest, and it was &#039;only&#039; a case of 18 months work to bring them up to scratch. The first two came out six months apart while the third has a gap of 10 months.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;They&#039;re only series books, though, not a trilogy. I intend to get the first draft of book four out of the way next month, thanks to Nanowrimo (Mine are 80,000 words per title, and I have 40k already.)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;At the moment I&#039;m just writing on spec - my contract was for three books, now delivered, and so it&#039;ll be up to my agent to find a home for any others. However, I&#039;m not sitting on my hands while he&#039;s trying to get people interested, and if I have one or two more manuscripts in the bag by then I&#039;ll be looking a lot better than if I only have a notebook with a few ideas in.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was lucky with my first three books &#8211; I&#8217;d written them all by the time a publisher expressed any interest, and it was &#8216;only&#8217; a case of 18 months work to bring them up to scratch. The first two came out six months apart while the third has a gap of 10 months.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re only series books, though, not a trilogy. I intend to get the first draft of book four out of the way next month, thanks to Nanowrimo (Mine are 80,000 words per title, and I have 40k already.)</p>
<p>At the moment I&#8217;m just writing on spec &#8211; my contract was for three books, now delivered, and so it&#8217;ll be up to my agent to find a home for any others. However, I&#8217;m not sitting on my hands while he&#8217;s trying to get people interested, and if I have one or two more manuscripts in the bag by then I&#8217;ll be looking a lot better than if I only have a notebook with a few ideas in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
